| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 5 | |
| 2. |  | CALLAHAM, M. A.; BUTT, K. R.; LOWE, C. N. Stable isotope evidence for marine-derived avian inputs of nitrogen into detrital foodwebs on the Isle of Rum, Scotland, UK. In: INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON SOIL ZOOLOGY, 15; INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON APTERYGOTA, 12., 2008, Curitiba. Biodiversity, conservation and sustainabele management of soil animal: abstracts. Colombo: Embrapa Florestas. Editors: George Gardner Brown; Klaus Dieter Sautter; Renato Marques; Amarildo Pasini. 1 CD-ROM.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
|   |
| 3. | | CALLAHAM, M.; BROWN, G. G.; FRAGOSO, C.; SNYDER, B.; JAMES, S. Earthworms in the non-glaciated Americas: intentional introductions, invasions, soil quality indicators, and interactions with native species. In: INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON SOIL ZOOLOGY, 16., 2012, Coimbra. Book of abstracts. Coimbra: University of Coimbra, 2012. P. 97.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
|  |
| 4. | | POTAPOV, A. M.; SUN, X.; BARNES, A. D.; BRIONES, M. J. I.; BROWN, G. G.; CAMERON, E. K.; CHANG, C.-H.; CORTET, J.; EISENHAUER, N.; FRANCO, A. L. C.; FUJII, S.; GEISEN, S.; GONGALSKY, K. B.; GUERRA, C.; HAIMI, J.; HANDA, I. T.; JANION-SCHEEPERS, C.; KARABAN, K.; LINDO, Z.; MATHIEU, J.; MORENO, M. L.; MURVANIDZE, M.; NIELSEN, U. N.; SCHEU, S.; SCHMIDT, O.; SCHNEIDER, C.; SEEBER, J.; TSIAFOULI, M. A.; TUMA, J.; TIUNOV, A. V.; ZAITSEV, A. S.; ASHWOOD, F.; CALLAHAM, M.; WALL, D. H. Global monitoring of soil animal communities using a common methodology. Soil Organisms, v. 94, n. 1, p. 55-68, Apr. 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| 5. | | PHILLIPS, H. R. P.; GUERRA, C. A.; BARTZ, M. L. C.; BRIONES, M. J. I.; BROWN, G. G.; CROWTHER, T. W.; FERLIAN, O.; GONGALSKY, K. B.; VAN DEN HOOGEN, J.; KREBS, J.; ORGIAZZI, A.; ROUTH, D.; SCHWARZ, B.; BACH, E. M.; BENNETT, J.; BROSE, U.; DECAËNS, T.; KÖNIG-RIES, B.; LOREAU, M.; MATHIEU, J.; MULDER, C.; VAN DER PUTTEN, W. H.; RAMIREZ, K. S.; RILLIG, M. C.; RUSSELL, D.; RUTGERS, M.; THAKUR, M. P.; VRIES, F. T. de; WALL, D. H.; WARDLE, D. A.; ARAI, M.; AYUKE, F. O.; BAKER, G. H.; BEAUSÉJOUR, R.; BEDANO, J. C.; BIRKHOFER, K.; BLANCHART, E.; BLOSSEY, B.; BOLGER, T.; BRADLEY, R. L.; CALLAHAM, M. A.; CAPOWIEZ, Y.; CAULFIELD, M. E.; CHOI, A.; CROTTY, F. V.; DÁVALOS, A.; DIAZ COSIN, D. J.; DOMINGUEZ, A.; ESTEBAN DUHOUR, A.; VAN EEKEREN, N.; EMMERLING, C.; FALCO, L. B.; FERNÁNDEZ, R.; FONTE, S. J.; FRAGOSO, C.; FRANCO, A. L. C.; FUGÈRE, M.; FUSILERO, A. T.; GHOLAMI, S.; GUNDALE, M. J.; GUTIÉRREZ LÓPEZ, M.; HACKENBERGER, D. K.; HERNÁNDEZ, L. M.; HISHI, T.; HOLDSWORTH, A. R.; HOLMSTRUP, M.; HOPFENSPERGER, K. N.; HUERTA LWANGA, E.; HUHTA, V.; HURISSO, T. T.; IANNONE III, B. V.; IORDACHE, M.; JOSCHKO, M.; KANEKO, N.; KANIANSKA, R.; KEITH, A. M.; KELLY, C. A.; KERNECKER, M. L.; KLAMINDER, J.; KONÉ, A. W.; KOOCH, Y.; KUKKONEN, S. T.; LALTHANZARA, H.; LAMMEL, D. R.; LEBEDEV, I. M.; LI, Y.; JESUS LIDON, J. B.; LINCOLN, N. K.; LOSS, S. R.; MARICHAL, R.; MATULA, R.; MOOS, J. H.; MORENO, G.; MORÓN-RÍOS, A.; MUYS, B.; NEIRYNCK, J.; NORGROVE, L.; NOVO, M.; NUUTINEN, V.; NUZZO, V.; MUJEEB RAHMAN, P.; PANSU, J.; PAUDEL, S.; PÉRÈS, G.; PÉREZ-CAMACHO, L.; PIÑEIRO, R.; PONGE, J.-F.; RASHID, M. I.; REBOLLO, S.; RODEIRO-IGLESIAS, J.; RODRÍGUEZ, M. Á.; ROTH, A. M.; ROUSSEAU, G. X.; ROZEN, A.; SAYAD, E.; VAN SCHAIK, L.; SCHARENBROCH, B. C.; SCHIRRMANN, M.; SCHMIDT, O.; SCHRÖDER, B.; SEEBER, J.; SHASHKOV, M. P.; SINGH, J.; SMITH, S. M.; STEINWANDTER, M.; TALAVERA, J. A.; TRIGO, D.; TSUKAMOTO, J.; VALENÇA, A. W. de; VANEK, S. J.; VIRTO, I.; WACKETT, A. A.; WARREN, M. W.; WEHR, N. H.; WHALEN, J. K.; WIRONEN, M. B.; WOLTERS, V.; ZENKOVA, I. V.; ZHANG, W.; CAMERON, E. K.; EISENHAUER, N. Global distribution of earthworm diversity. Science, v. 366, n. 6464, p. 480-485, Oct. 2019.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
|  |
| Registros recuperados : 5 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cppse.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
|
Data corrente: |
18/05/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
10/03/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
BERNARDO, A. P. DA S.; FERREIRA, F. M. S.; SILVA, A. C. M. DA; PRESTES, F. S.; FRANCISCO, V. C.; NASSU, R. T.; NASCIMENTO, M. DA S. DO; PFLANZER, S. B. |
|
Afiliação: |
ANA PAULA DA SILVA BERNARDO, UNICAMP; FELIPE MARINELLI SARAIVA FERREIRA, UNICAMP; ASTRID CAROLINE MUNIZ DA SILVA, UNICAMP; FLÁVIA SOUZA PRESTES, UNICAMP; VANESSA CRISTINA FRANCISCO, UNESP; RENATA TIEKO NASSU, CPPSE; MARISTELA DA SILVA DO NASCIMENTO, UNICAMP; SÉRGIO BERTELLI PFLANZER, UNICAMP. |
|
Título: |
Dry-aged and wet-aged beef: effects of aging time and temperature on microbiological profile, physicochemical characteristics, volatile compound profile and weight loss of meat from Nellore cattle (Bos indicus). |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Animal Production Science, v. 61, n. 14, p. 1497-1509, may 2021. |
|
ISSN: |
1836-5787 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1071/AN20120 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Context. Dry-aged beef is a value-added product with a unique flavour. The effects of the dry aging process, in terms of chamber temperature and aging time, have not been described previously for Bos indicus meat. Aims. This study evaluated the effects of aging conditions (method, temperature, time) on the microbiological, physicochemical, volatile compound profile and weight loss characteristics of dry-aged and wet-aged beef from Nellore cattle (Bos indicus). Methods. Beef loins (n = 16) were cut into eight portions and assigned to treatments in a complete block design combining aging method (dry or wet), temperature (2 C or 7 C) and time (21 or 42 days). Key results. Samples dry-aged at 7 C had higher (P < 0.05) weight loss than samples dry-aged at 2 C. Although storage temperature did not affect (P > 0.05) the yield of wet-aged samples, Enterobacteriaceae counts increased (P < 0.05) in the samples stored at 7 C compared with 2 C. Aging for 42 days resulted in greater (P < 0.05) process losses (drip + evaporation + trimming) for both aging methods than aging for 21 days. The pH, moisture content and Warner–Bratzler shear force values were not affected (P > 0.05) by aging method, temperature or time. Qualitative analysis indicated that volatile compounds were affected by aging method and time, but not by aging temperature. Conclusions. The results indicate that higher temperature and longer aging periods cannot be not recommended for either dry or wet aging, owing to the increase in process losses of dry-aged samples, and growth of Enterobacteriaceae and psychrotrophic bacteria in wet-aged samples. Implications. This study highlights the importance of controlling conditions for dry aging to produce a safe product and obtain higher yields. Processing plants or retailers that produce dry-aged or wet-aged meat could use these results to adjust their production systems. MenosContext. Dry-aged beef is a value-added product with a unique flavour. The effects of the dry aging process, in terms of chamber temperature and aging time, have not been described previously for Bos indicus meat. Aims. This study evaluated the effects of aging conditions (method, temperature, time) on the microbiological, physicochemical, volatile compound profile and weight loss characteristics of dry-aged and wet-aged beef from Nellore cattle (Bos indicus). Methods. Beef loins (n = 16) were cut into eight portions and assigned to treatments in a complete block design combining aging method (dry or wet), temperature (2 C or 7 C) and time (21 or 42 days). Key results. Samples dry-aged at 7 C had higher (P < 0.05) weight loss than samples dry-aged at 2 C. Although storage temperature did not affect (P > 0.05) the yield of wet-aged samples, Enterobacteriaceae counts increased (P < 0.05) in the samples stored at 7 C compared with 2 C. Aging for 42 days resulted in greater (P < 0.05) process losses (drip + evaporation + trimming) for both aging methods than aging for 21 days. The pH, moisture content and Warner–Bratzler shear force values were not affected (P > 0.05) by aging method, temperature or time. Qualitative analysis indicated that volatile compounds were affected by aging method and time, but not by aging temperature. Conclusions. The results indicate that higher temperature and longer aging periods cannot be not recommended for either dry or wet aging, owing to the in... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Aging time; Dry aging; Nellore cattle; Wet aging. |
|
Thesagro: |
Bos Indicus. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Beef quality; Temperature. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
Q Alimentos e Nutrição Humana |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02950naa a2200313 a 4500
001 2131876
005 2023-03-10
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1836-5787
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1071/AN20120$2DOI
100 1 $aBERNARDO, A. P. DA S.
245 $aDry-aged and wet-aged beef$beffects of aging time and temperature on microbiological profile, physicochemical characteristics, volatile compound profile and weight loss of meat from Nellore cattle (Bos indicus).$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
520 $aContext. Dry-aged beef is a value-added product with a unique flavour. The effects of the dry aging process, in terms of chamber temperature and aging time, have not been described previously for Bos indicus meat. Aims. This study evaluated the effects of aging conditions (method, temperature, time) on the microbiological, physicochemical, volatile compound profile and weight loss characteristics of dry-aged and wet-aged beef from Nellore cattle (Bos indicus). Methods. Beef loins (n = 16) were cut into eight portions and assigned to treatments in a complete block design combining aging method (dry or wet), temperature (2 C or 7 C) and time (21 or 42 days). Key results. Samples dry-aged at 7 C had higher (P < 0.05) weight loss than samples dry-aged at 2 C. Although storage temperature did not affect (P > 0.05) the yield of wet-aged samples, Enterobacteriaceae counts increased (P < 0.05) in the samples stored at 7 C compared with 2 C. Aging for 42 days resulted in greater (P < 0.05) process losses (drip + evaporation + trimming) for both aging methods than aging for 21 days. The pH, moisture content and Warner–Bratzler shear force values were not affected (P > 0.05) by aging method, temperature or time. Qualitative analysis indicated that volatile compounds were affected by aging method and time, but not by aging temperature. Conclusions. The results indicate that higher temperature and longer aging periods cannot be not recommended for either dry or wet aging, owing to the increase in process losses of dry-aged samples, and growth of Enterobacteriaceae and psychrotrophic bacteria in wet-aged samples. Implications. This study highlights the importance of controlling conditions for dry aging to produce a safe product and obtain higher yields. Processing plants or retailers that produce dry-aged or wet-aged meat could use these results to adjust their production systems.
650 $aBeef quality
650 $aTemperature
650 $aBos Indicus
653 $aAging time
653 $aDry aging
653 $aNellore cattle
653 $aWet aging
700 1 $aFERREIRA, F. M. S.
700 1 $aSILVA, A. C. M. DA
700 1 $aPRESTES, F. S.
700 1 $aFRANCISCO, V. C.
700 1 $aNASSU, R. T.
700 1 $aNASCIMENTO, M. DA S. DO
700 1 $aPFLANZER, S. B.
773 $tAnimal Production Science$gv. 61, n. 14, p. 1497-1509, may 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste (CPPSE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
